Toast was toast, or how Wheat Belly and its author changed my diet

  |

It began, as many misadventures do, innocently enough.
I had baked a loaf of bread. A simple, honest bread made from the best of simple, honest ingredients. Nonetheless, several dinner guests declined the bread. My friends, it turned out, were boycotting gluten. Hadn’t I heard? Gluten was the new great Satan. It was as if I were offering cocktails of Red Dye No. 2 served with asbestos straws in leaded crystal tumblers.
I had misguidedly thought that homemade bread had placed me in the vanguard of healthy living. Apparently I was wrong. I’d inadvertently played into the hands of the industrial baking complex and their evil agenda.
This led me to an inquiry into the gluten gripe, that led to poking about the subject of commercial baking, that led to examining the GMO debacle that deposited me on a sofa opposite Dr. William Davis, author of the massively bestselling book, Wheat Belly, and now the Wheat Belly Cookbook.
The simple loaf of bread quickly became a can of worms. Food, it turns out, is really complicated these days.

What grains and gluten mean (or don’t mean) for weight loss

Are grains helpful or harmful to our health and our waistline? Last week we took a look at some of the nutritional pluses and minuses that come with eating whole grains, as well as some of the effects of whole versus refined grains on our health. This week, we’ll take a closer look at the role that grains, and especially gluten, play (or don’t play) in weight loss.
When it comes to weight loss, gluten-free diets are all the rage. Unfortunately, despite the claims that gluten, a protein found in wheat, barley, and rye foods promotes weight gain, there are no published clinical trials to date comparing a gluten-free versus gluten-containing diets for weight loss.
We do, however, have data on gluten-free diets for those with celiac disease, an auto-immune condition whereby the small intestine is damaged by exposure to gluten, and the news might surprise you: patients with celiac disease actually tend to have higher body mass indexes (BMIs, or a measure of height versus weight) than those without the disease.


Where to begin? It turns out that bread isn’t what it used to be because flour isn’t what it used to be because wheat isn’t what it used to be.
Historically, bread is made from four ingredients: Flour, water, salt and yeast. Bread is so natural, that by combining just two of these ingredients — flour and water — bread will sometimes make itself.
Most people buy their bread off a grocery store shelf. Mass produced store-bought bread is delightfully squishy, uniform and imperishable.
Bread needs time to rise. Time is money so industrial bakers add enzymes to hasten this process. People like certain appearances so various colourants are added to appease that aesthetic. The issue of “fresh” is challenged as bread now has to travel great distances to market, so preservatives are added. The humble loaf of bread thus morphs into something much more complex.
Denatured is the word that crops up time and time again when contemporary wheat flour is mentioned. It used to be that your bag of all-purpose flour was flecked with brown pips — the germ of the wheat. That’s milled out now as wheat germ goes rancid quickly. What do they do with the wheat germ? Millers sell it to vitamin manufacturers who sell it back to us as Vitamin E. Go figure.
There is, as they say, more grist for this mill but we need to move along.
The core issue here is with wheat. Yes, those amber waves of grain that comprise the backbone of contemporary agriculture are where things gets really complicated.
What we call wheat is a distant relative to what our grandparents called wheat
What we call wheat is a distant relative to what our grandparents called wheat. I’m going to hazard to say that there was no nefarious agenda to transform wheat into the Franken-grain many believe it’s become. Instead, it appears that a series of well-intentioned adjustments were made to address world hunger. If we could increase the yield per acre of wheat, fewer people might starve to death. A noble objective, no? The complexity at play between humans and our natural world, however, isn’t very tolerant of certain changes.
Old wheat was four feet high with seeds that clung to the stem. They were adaptable and hardy plants. Crop yield was dictated by climate and natural growing seasons. New wheat, however, is dwarf or semi-dwarf varieties of about two feet height, relying on a steady diet of nitrates, irrigation and pest control. This combination means a field can produce 10-fold the yield. Threshing is easier as the grain is exposed and engineered for more expedient harvest. I have a postcard in my office that reads: “Cheap. Fast. Good. Choose two.” Apparently, we chose cheap and fast. In many ways, it was a defensible choice.
Dr. William Davis sums it up this way: ‘Celiac disease is the canary in the coal mine’
This is the stuff you can see. On a genetic level, new wheat is different altogether. The evidence is mounting that humans are having an especially hard time with the new strains of wheat. The hybridized or genetically modified wheat protein — the infamous gluten — is something completely new. It’s these new wheat proteins that are associated with the four-fold upswing in celiac disease over the past half-century. It can be argued that all this tinkering with wheat is giving rise to the upswing in gluten intolerances as well as celiac disease. Dr. William Davis sums it up this way:
“Celiac disease is the canary in the coal mine” where wheat is concerned.
The bestseller Wheat Belly pivots upon these issues. Most are led to the book by vague complaints associated with ill effects associated with wheat consumption. Davis, a cardiologist, began his own inquiry began as he explored ways to manage his patients’ diabetic issues. Bread, it turns out, has a whopping glycemic index. A glycemic index is the comparative effect of carbohydrates on blood sugar. Table sugar has a GI of 59; a slice of whole grain bread has a GI of 72. The culprit here is the highly digestible carbohydrate, amylopectin A, which Davis says is more detrimental to the body than white sugar. New science suggests avoiding blood sugar surges is essential to good health. A high GI number will spike your blood sugar. Diabetes is providing the clues here. According to Davis, diabetes is “a proving ground for accelerated aging.” Mismanaged blood sugar issues take a hideous toll on diabetics and non-diabetics alike. What you want to avoid are advanced glycation end-products.
Glucose-protein combinations — useless debris — muck up the body in just about every way imaginable: Cataracts, dementia, wrinkles, coronary artery disease, cancer, arthritis
These are the glucose-protein combinations — useless debris — that muck up the body in just about every way imaginable. Cataracts, dementia, wrinkles, coronary artery disease, cancer, arthritis: glycemic index figures are tied to all these. Wheat is uniquely positioned because of its unique blood glucose-increasing effects to be a catalyst for this laundry list of nasty developments.
Oh my.
This, I figured, is how heavy smokers must have felt when doctor’s reversed their opinion on the health benefits of cigarettes. To my mind, there is no greater love story than that of soup and sandwich. I am helpless to resist the plain-spoken charms of the humble muffin.
If you go to the gym and wear sunscreen and find a way to hide kale in just about everything your family eats, all of the foregoing would set off alarm bells. And it did.

Battle over bread: Are wheat and other grains really anathema to healthy eating?

Are grains a nutritional enemy?
According to one increasingly popular line of thinking, grain-based foods trigger undesirable blood sugar fluctuations, tooth decay and inflammation in our body, which in turn may lead to heart disease, type 2 diabetes and even cancer. Of the grains we consume regularly, wheat and its derivatives have been targeted as being particularly harmful, largely due to the presence of gluten, a protein that is known to trigger serious health issues in those with celiac disease and in those who’ve more recently been identified as having non-celiac gluten sensitivity.
By contrast, a second line of thinking argues that it’s not grains, but rather the high intake of animal protein that is the issue with the Western diet, and that a regimen based on whole grains, fruits and vegetables, nuts, seeds, beans and pulses will pave the road to good health.


I decided to take up Davis’s challenge. I undertook a season of living wheatlessly. Toast was toast. I started in mid-September. And again in late September. Then in October, in earnest. Giving up wheat is tougher than you might imagine. One miscalculation, one mindless ingestion, one uninformed choice, and I was off the plan. Wheat is everywhere!
At this point, it was mostly just elimination. I substituted cucumber slices for crackers. I abandoned cereal for smoothies. Salads replaced sandwiches. It was, let me tell you, no fun. I became that person at the dinner party declining artisanal bread, pasta, crusted halibut steaks, dessert; the same person I had cursed while clearing the dishes. And then I got serious. I moved on to the Wheat Belly Cookbook. This entailed a shopping trip for specific provisions. My pantry filled up with subtypes of flour that had previously escaped my notice: chickpea flour, quinoa flour, coconut flour, and others. To address Davis’s warning about advanced glycation end-products, I carted home stevia and Splenda as sugar substitutes. I baked Wheat Belly muffins and thanked God I wasn’t a celiac. One dozen expensive coconut flour, stevia sweetened banana muffins languished on the counter;
nobody wanted them. We found most of the Wheat Belly Cookbook baked goods far too sweet for our taste.
I experimented with my own coconut flour crusted fried chicken and decided boiled chicken was a better option
I experimented with my own coconut flour crusted fried chicken and decided boiled chicken was a better option. Wheat Belly pizza, if you divorced yourself from all previously held concepts of pizza, was a decent vegetarian dish. The cookbook would have you believe that mashed cauliflower duplicates a biscuit crust of a chicken pot pie. It doesn’t. Which is not to say that mashed cauliflower topped with shredded cheddar isn’t tasty, it’s just not chicken pot pie. The Wheat Belly recipes that don’t hinge on wheat flour are completely acceptable recipes, but the baked goods were uniformly not to my liking; nut and seed flours make for leaden baked goods. One way to include allowable wheat-free baking was to get my hands on some non-GMO wheat. I sent away to Heritage Wheat Conservancy in Massachusetts for a bag of einkorn wheat, ground it in my Vitamix and baked a single loaf. Meh. Maybe I milled it badly? Maybe I need to adjust the recipe? I need to keep experimenting, I guess.
Ben Nelms for National Post/files
Ben Nelms for National Post/files 
Wheat Belly author William Davis says the highly digestible 
carbohydrate amylopectin A is more detrimental to
the body than white sugar.

It became a matter of having satisfying alternatives on hand. No doubt you’ll have noticed the gluten-free products flooding the market. Davis expects to see a spike in diabetes from these products as the tapioca, rice, corn and potato starches that replace wheat gluten have sky-high glycemic indexes that will ultimately take their health toll. He’d also advise you to be skeptical of the purported health benefits of whole grains. When we met in Vancouver to discuss his work, Davis spoke of a wide range of food staples that are now subjected to a broad spectrum of chemical- and radiation-based hybridization techniques that are “unleashed on an unwitting public.” His account of the “traditional breeding” methods responsible for Clearfield Wheat had me genuinely worried. But nothing about Davis suggested a strident alarmist. He seemed a soft-spoken, reasonable Midwesterner who had backed into some information he felt the public ought to be aware of, and he was proposing a way to navigate the mess we’re in.
Wheat Belly spoke of a wheat-induced mental fog that would lift as wheat cleared my system; unwanted pounds were supposed to fall off; various physical complaints were expected to subside. This was not my experience. I wasn’t looking to lose weight, and I didn’t. Mental fog wasn’t a chronic complaint of mine so I can’t say I was suddenly beset with clear-thinking punditry. My litany of physical complaints remains pretty much unchanged. Improvements, however, are dependent upon one’s personal degree of wheat intolerance and maybe I’m one of the lucky, tolerant ones. I will say that I found my appetite decreased as Davis said it likely would.
I haven’t kept up my wheat-less experiment; I miss bread too much
I haven’t kept up my wheat-less experiment; I miss bread too much. I’ve made several changes, however, but given the complex chemical issues involved with wheat, half measures offer little benefit. I learned a lot from the Wheat Belly books. The cookbook can’t be judged as a traditional cookbook — it fails miserably — but offers excellent suggestions for navigating what’s starting to look like a very serious public health issue. I’m keeping an eye on the earnest young men and women who are trying to bring pre-GMO wheat back into production and I urge you to support them, too.
And thus ends my Wheat Belly experiment. I’m going to celebrate with one of the happy adjuncts of my wheatless experience: sorghum beer! Delicious! Trust me.

Eating nuts tied to lower risk of dying from cancer, heart disease (and a slimmer waist), Harvard study finds

Ebrahim Noroozi/AP files

DALLAS — Help yourself to some nuts this holiday season: Regular nut eaters were less likely to die of cancer or heart disease — in fact, were less likely to die of any cause — during a 30-year Harvard study.

Introducing omega-7s, the new fatty acid on the block

Have you taken your omega-7s today?
If you follow nutrition information even half-heartedly, there’s a good chance you’ve heard of omega-3 fatty acids, the fats derived primarily from fish that are thought to be good for our hearts and brains, and that can reduce inflammation throughout the body. Less well-known, but still relevant are the omega-9 fatty acids, which can be derived from the likes of olive oil. Unlike omega-3s and omega-6s, however, omega-9 fatty acids can be manufactured in our body, and are therefore not actually essential to a healthy diet. So what are omega-7s, and why do they matter? We are only beginning to understand them, but what we know so far is both intriguing and promising.
Nuts have long been called heart-healthy, and the study is the largest ever done on whether eating them affects mortality.
Researchers tracked 119,000 men and women and found that those who ate nuts roughly every day were 20% less likely to die during the study period than those who never ate nuts. Eating nuts less often lowered the death risk too, in direct proportion to consumption.
The risk of dying of heart disease dropped 29% and the risk of dying of cancer fell 11% among those who had nuts seven or more times a week compared with people who never ate them.
The benefits were seen from peanuts as well as from pistachios, almonds, walnuts and other tree nuts. The researchers did not look at how the nuts were prepared — oiled or salted, raw or roasted.
A bonus: Nut eaters stayed slimmer.
“There’s a general perception that if you eat more nuts you’re going to get fat. Our results show the opposite,” said Dr. Ying Bao of Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.
She led the study, published in Thursday’s New England Journal of Medicine. The U.S. National Institutes of Health and the International Tree Nut Council Nutrition Research & Education Foundation sponsored the study, but the nut group had no role in designing it or reporting the results.
Researchers don’t know why nuts may boost health. It could be that their unsaturated fatty acids, minerals and other nutrients lower cholesterol and inflammation and reduce other problems, as earlier studies seemed to show.
‘Sometimes when you eat nuts you eat less of something else like potato chips’
Observational studies like this one can’t prove cause and effect, only suggest a connection. Research on diets is especially tough, because it can be difficult to single out the effects of any one food.
People who eat more nuts may eat them on salads, for example, and some of the benefit may come from the leafy greens, said Dr. Robert Eckel, a University of Colorado cardiologist and former president of the American Heart Association.
Dr. Ralph Sacco, a University of Miami neurologist who also is a former heart association president, agreed.
“Sometimes when you eat nuts you eat less of something else like potato chips,” so the benefit may come from avoiding an unhealthy food, Sacco said.
The Harvard group has long been known for solid science on diets. Its findings build on a major study earlier this year — a rigorous experiment that found a Mediterranean-style diet supplemented with nuts cuts the chance of heart-related problems, especially strokes, in older people at high risk of them.
Many previous studies tie nut consumption to lower risks of heart disease, diabetes, colon cancer and other maladies.
In 2003, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said a fistful of nuts a day as part of a low-fat diet may reduce the risk of heart disease. The heart association recommends four servings of unsalted, unoiled nuts a week and warns against eating too many, since they are dense in calories.
The new research combines two studies that started in the 1980s on 76,464 female nurses and 42,498 male health professionals. They filled out surveys on food and lifestyle habits every two to four years, including how often they ate a serving (1 ounce) of nuts.
Study participants who often ate nuts were healthier — they weighed less, exercised more and were less likely to smoke, among other things. After taking these and other things into account, researchers still saw a strong benefit from nuts.
We did so many analyses, very sophisticated ones, to eliminate other possible explanations
Compared with people who never ate nuts, those who had them less than once a week reduced their risk of death 7%; once a week, 11%; two to four times a week, 13%; and seven or more times a week, 20%.
“I’m very confident” the observations reflect a true benefit, Bao said. “We did so many analyses, very sophisticated ones,” to eliminate other possible explanations.
For example, they did separate analyses on smokers and non-smokers, heavy and light exercisers, and people with and without diabetes, and saw a consistent benefit from nuts.
‘We’re seeing benefits of nut consumption on cardiovascular disease as well as body weight and diabetes’
At a heart association conference in Dallas this week, Penny Kris-Etheron, a Pennsylvania State University nutrition scientist, reviewed previous studies on this topic.
“We’re seeing benefits of nut consumption on cardiovascular disease as well as body weight and diabetes,” said Kris-Etherton, who has consulted for nut makers and also served on many scientific panels on dietary guidelines.
“We don’t know exactly what it is” about nuts that boosts health or which ones are best, she said. “I tell people to eat mixed nuts.”

Jane Macdougall: What does cancer eat? Sugar, mostly, and other lessons from my dinner with a professor of pathology


"What got my attention was his remark about celery.
You know: the dieters’ wishful thinking on whether eating celery is a sum negative activity, or not.
He was certainly entitled to speak. His name is Dr. Gerald Krystal and he’s a professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at University of British Columbia, as well as Distinguished Scientist at the Terry Fox Laboratory at the BC Cancer Agency.
We were perched like vultures over a buffet table, commenting on the many ways to die. Fats, salts, sugars, alcohol: pick your delicious poison. I like ’em all.
The dietary folklore related to celery hardly registers in Dr. Krystal’s purview. He started his career as molecular biochemist working on cell signalling, which is to say the ways cells communicate with each other. Delightfully, he describes it as a molecular square dance, with cells reacting to specific instructions that we’re still just beginning to comprehend.
What we call cancer, the medical profession refers to as malignant neoplasm. For reasons researchers are still trying to establish, cells spontaneously divide and grow uncontrollably creating malignant tumours. These tumour cells can then invade other parts of the body. Unfortunately, many of us are all too familiar with this hideous science lesson called metastasis.
But here’s what I was surprised to learn. I might have had cancer several times in my life. Same goes for you. The immune system — well-supported — is a trooper. It’s capable of dispatching proliferations and inflammations, vanquishing many invaders without you ever being aware of it. How real is the threat of cancer in a lifetime? No one knows for sure, but here’s a surprising statistic: Patients on immune-suppressant drugs following organ transplantation have a 100-fold increase of cancer incidence. When the body’s natural defences are inhibited, cancer cells can easily run amok, and they do so 100 times more often than in other people.
So, what makes the critical difference in what wins this silent battle: cancer, or your immune system? This is the question that has occupied much of Dr. Krystal’s career.
He began by observing that Positron Emission Tomography — PET scans used for tumour and inflammation detection — revealed a particular pattern of deoxyglucose use. Apparently, cancer has an appetite for glucose that is three times that than of other cells; that’s what the PET scan is looking for. This rapid ingestion of glucose leads to the secretion of lactic acid which decreases cellular pH and — here’s the aha! moment — that’s what encourages metastasis. And where does the body get all this glucose? Well, it gets it from the standard Western diet; a diet, it turns out, that’s perfectly designed to kill us all.
I was doing my best to wade through Dr. Krystal’s research, Googling every third word. In the basest of laymen’s terms I’ll tell you that his findings hinged on a suspicion that it might be possible to starve cancer by blocking a tumour from accessing glucose. Dr. Krystal set about to see if it was possible to affect tumour growth or — perhaps even better — tumour initiation by affecting blood glucose levels. At the time he started his inquiry, this theory flew in the face of the prevailing science. Almost a decade after he began, his findings reveal that diet may play an even larger role than previously suspected in who gets cancer and which cancers metastasize.
Cancer, it turns out, craves carbs. Typically, the maleficent Western diet is made up of over 50% carbohydrates and only 15% protein. Protein has a unique capacity to enhance a body’s immune system but most of us don’t get nearly enough of this essential nutrient. We love our fats, however, but the wrong sort of fats in the wrong amounts can also prove deadly.
The foodstuffs we favour create a hospitable environment for cancer in a variety of ways. Calorie-rich, but nutrient-unbalanced, our grub tends to render us immuno-incompetent. That’s a big word that means defenceless. Obesity, unhealthy in and of itself, is a widespread side effect of the typical Western diet, but also a source of systemic inflammation. Inflammation engenders DNA damage which increases the risk of cancer.
Dr. Krystal’s team continues to explore the subject of diet-related tumour growth and initiation. The clinical trials with mice, however, suggest that we should all be making massive shifts in what we eat. Almost half the mice on the western diet developed mammary cancers by middle age, whereas none of the mice on the low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet did. Only one of the test mice achieved a normal life span on the standard western diet, with the rest of dying early of cancer-associated deaths. More than 50% of the mice on a low-carbohydrate diet, however, reached or exceeded a normal life span.
The patient parking lot next to the BC Cancer Agency was full the day I visited. As I made my way up the stairs, I couldn’t help but think that we do, indeed, dig our own graves with a spoon.
The good news, however, is that it really does take more calories to digest a stick of celery than are found in celery. The other good news is that celery can’t hurt you one bit."

Bolachas de Citrinos


Projecto Felicidário: Carolina Celas
Ingredientes:
  • 100gr de manteiga em temperatura ambiente;
  • 225gr de açúcar;
  • 2 ovos;
  • 450gr de farinha de trigo;
  • 1/2 colher de chá de fermento em pó;
  • 1 pitada de sal; e,
  • raspa e sumo de 1 limão ou laranja.
Misture a manteiga e o açúcar, com a batedeira, até ficar uma mistura fofa. Adicionar os ovos. Peneirar a farinha, adicionar o sal e o fermento em pó Adicionar ao preparado lentamente, com a batedeira em velocidade baixa, intercalando com a raspa e o sumo de limão/laranja.
foi aqui que tive de adicionar mais
Formar uma bola da massa, colocar num recipiente, por exemplo um tupperware, e levar ao frigorífico durante uma hora.
Estender a massa com o rolo, sobre uma superfície polvilhada com farinha, cortar as bolachas com formas. Colocar num tabuleiro, forrado com papel vegetal, colocar no forno pré aquecido a 180ºC, durante cerca de 10 minutos, até as extremidades começarem a ficar douradas.
Colocar sobre uma superfície e deixar arrefecer.
As bolachas podem ser guardadas num local seco, fechadas num recipiente hermético.

Um guia simples para desfrutar a culinária

por Joshua Becker
"... Ninguém nasce um grande cozinheiro, aprende-se fazendo." - Julia Child


Desde a descoberta minimalismo, a minha vida mudou significativamente. O processo de promoção dos valores e remover distrações forçou uma nova intencionalidade na vida. Como resultado, muitos dos meus hábitos mudaram. Gasto dinheiro de forma diferente. Passo o tempo de forma mais eficiente. Faço mais exercicio mais. Acordo cedo.


Além disso, curiosamente, eu aprendi a gosta de cozinhar. Eu não fui formalmente treinado. Eu não sou um chef. Na verdade, eu nem sei se eu sou o melhor cozinheiro da minha própria família. Mas eu aprendi recentemente para desfrutar plenamente o processo de preparação de uma refeição para a minha família. Encontro uma grande alegria na culinária, muito mais do que antes. E quando eu olhar para trás, esta mudança de vida específica, posso atribuir diretamente essa mudança a uma série de passos específicos que tomei. Talvez você possa acha-los úteis também. 
Um guia simples para desfrutar da culinária.

1 . Limpar os balcões de cozinha. A bancada da cozinha limpa e organizada é refrescante. Ela comunica calma e ordem. Ela economiza tempo e promove a limpeza. Incentiva oportunidade e possibilidade. Um contador claro proporciona o espaço necessário na sua cozinha, e na sua mente, para começar a cozinhar. Limpe sua tela.

2. Cozinhe comida saudável. Há uma satisfação agradável que vem de preparar alimentos saudáveis ​​para você e sua família. A sua importância no processo não pode ser exagerada. Ela fornece motivação e incentivo valioso para cozinhar as suas próprias refeições. E os benefícios positivos de cozinhar uma refeição saudável estendem-se muito além da mesa de jantar .

3. Use ingredientes frescos. Entre as mudanças que fiz na minha vida para estimular o meu amor por cozinhar, nada pode ser mais importante do que a decisão de começar a utilizar ingredientes frescos sempre que possível. Quando comecei a substituição especiarias secas por ingredientes frescos (cebola, alho, salsa, manjericão, limas, limões), o sabor das minhas refeições melhorou dramaticamente. Assim como a minha confiança e prazer.

4 . Possuia uma faca afiada. Aprenda a usá-la. Eu não tenho utensílios dispendiosos, nunca tive. Na verdade, eu continuo a usar as panelas que recebemos como presente de casamento há 14 anos. Mas quando comecei a cozinhar regularmente, eu comprei uma boa faca Santoku e nunca me arrependi da compra. Vamos utilizá-la quase todos os dias para cortar, fatiar e picar. E uma vez que você aprender a usá-la corretamente, preparar refeições torna-se muito mais fácil e agradável.

5. Comece com alimentos/receitas que você gosta. O primeiro livro que eu já usei foi Top Secret
Restaurant Recipes. Eu já estava familiarizado com muitos dos pratos e sabia quais eu gostava. Comecei por preparar as refeições de que mais gostava. Incorporei a mesma filosofia para cozinhar todos os meus novos pratos em casa. Eu gosto de comida mexicana, então procurar receitas de comida mexicana. Ultimamente, tenho vindo a explorar comida tailandesa (outro favorito) e experimentar novas receitas. A Internet está cheia de simples e fácil de seguir receitas. Procurar os alimentos que você sabe que você gosta, encontre uma fonte de receita confiável, e leia a seção de comentários para pensamentos e idéias adicionais.
 
6. Seja confiante. Você pode fazer isso. Caminhe até à tábua de corte, o forno ou o fogão com plena confiança em suas habilidades. Um espírito ansioso não gosta de criar. E, infelizmente, um espírito ansioso raramente consegue. Para gosta de cozinhar, você precisa se ​​convencer de que você é capaz de fazê-lo. Eventualmente, uma deliciosa refeição e um sorriso correspondente de seus convidados de mesa irá fazer o truque. Mas antes mesmo de o fazer, acredite em si mesmo. Comece a andar na sua cozinha (e mercearia), como se você soubesse o que está a fazer... e, em pouco tempo, você vai, realmente. Você ainda vai cometer erros, mas tudo bem. Apenas lembre-se, o maior erro que você pode fazer é não acreditar em si mesmo.


7. Valor apresentação. Existe um velho ditado entre chefs que diz assim : "Nós comemos com os olhos pela primeira vez." A pesquisa e a experiência validam as suas reivindicações. Alimentos que parecem ser bons é mais provável que tenham bom gosto. Alguns estudos parecem indicar que absorvemos mais nutrientes dos alimentos que são visualmente atraentes. Tire algum tempo extra para servir a sua comida numa apresentação visualmente atraente, mesmo se você estiver a comer sozinho. Você sempre vai disfrutar mais.


8. Aprecie a refeição. Esteja consciente da limpeza. Se você tem uma família, criar o espaço e a cultura, em sua casa, que preza os valores das refeições em conjunto. Para muitas famílias, isso não é possível em todas as refeições, mas isso não significa que
não crie espaço para algumas refeições familiares em conjunto. Pode ser necessário estabelecer uma certa margem ou ser criativo, mas quanto mais tempo passamos juntos ao redor da mesa de jantar, melhor. Apreciar a importância de sentar-se tempo suficiente para apreciar a sua comida. E, do mesmo modo, aprender a apreciar o ato de limpar depois. Ele não tem que ser visto como uma tarefa se o abordar com a mentalidade certa.

9. Grave suas receitas favoritas. Eu armazeno numa pequena caixa de cartão preta de índice, acima do fogão na cozinha. Dentro, eu mantenho todas as receitas de sucesso que eu descobri ao longo dos anos. É um sistema simples que funciona para mim. E tem sido um passo importante para aumentar o meu prazer de cozinhar, porque o verdadeiro valor da caixa preta é que eu tenho uma grande variedade de receitas, favoritas da família, diretamente na ponta dos dedos...


... E se a minha família encontra alegria na refeição na mesa, eu encontro alegria em prepará-la".

Panquecas ao estilo EUA



Maravilhosamente fofas e espessas

Ingredientes

  • 3 ovos de galinhas criadas ao ar livre
  • 115 g farinha
  • 1 colher de chá bem cheia de fermento-em-pó
  • 140 ml leite
  • 1 pitada de sal




Estas panquecas americanas são incríveis com frutas, natas, banana, xarope de Ácer, etc

4
20m
Muito fácil

Metodo

Estas panquecas americanas são ótimas! Em vez de serem finas e sedosas como crepes franceses, elas são maravilhosamente macias e espessas e pode ser feitas, até à perfeição, de imediato. Simples, simples, simples.

Primeiro separar os ovos, colocando as claras numa tigela e as gemas noutra. Adicione a farinha, o fermento e o leite às gemas e misture com um batedor, até obter uma mistura de espessura lisa. Bata as claras com o sal até formar picos firmes. Misture as claras em castelo na massa - que agora está pronta para usar.

Aqueça uma boa frigideira antiaderente em fogo médio. Despeje um pouco de sua massa na frigideira e frite por alguns minutos até que começar a ficar dourada e firme. Neste ponto, pode acrescentar o ingrediente extra para o lado cru antes de soltar com uma espátula e virar a panqueca. Continue fritando até que ambos os lados estejam dourados.

Você pode fazer essas panquecas grandes ou pequenas, a seu gosto. Você pode servi-las simplesmente mergulhado em xarope de Ácer, ou com um pouco de manteiga ou natas. Ou, se você optar por um ingrediente extraa, tente um destes:
milho fresco,
mirtilos,banana, maçã ralada/às fatias,chocolate ralado,qualquer outra coisa que você pode imaginar...
PS - Panquecas de mirtilo (acima) são óptimas, mas você deve experimentar as panquecas de milho. Com uma condição - você deve usar milho fresco. Para fazer isso, retire as folhas exteriores e corte cuidadosamente uma faca de milho - este vai soltar todos os grãos de milho - e polvilhe dessas matérias sobre sua panqueca, antes de virá-lo na panela. Eu gostaria de ter um pouco de bacon grelhado sobre minhas panquecas de milho, regadas com um pouco de xarope de Ácer. Isso soa horrível mas sinceramente gosto muito!
Informação Nutricional. Quantidade por porção


Usos Criativos para Queijo Cottage

Abóbora recheada

Recheie a abóbora com cebolas refogadas e cogumelos, pão ralado integral, ovos e queijo cottage. Após gratinar, acompanhe com rúcula ou salsa e alecrim fresco.






Batatas recheadas

Asse batatas, recheando com queijo cottage e cebolinho. Polvilhe um pouco de queijo Cheddar ralado, se você preferir.





Aperitivos

Bata o queijo cottage até que esteja macio, em seguida, adicione pimenta preta e ervas. Espalhe em torradas de pão integral e cubra com uma fatia de tomate ou pepino para um aperitivo rápido.





Em substituição de óleo

Use queijo cottage em substituição de óleo em pastelaria. Experimente em pão, muffins e outros artigos de pastelaria.





Fonte e imagens: http://www.sparkpeople.com/resource/slideshow.asp?show=89